Economic soul

stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20587
    [title] => The (difficult) Catholic third way between capitalism and socialism
    [alias] => the-difficult-catholic-third-way-between-capitalism-and-socialism
    [introtext] => 

Economic Soul/2 - From neo-Thomism to withstand the impact of the dominant culture to the ideas of Father Liberatore that paved the way for “Rerum novarum”

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 18, 2026 

«It is an anti-historical attitude par excellence to consider the problems, opinions, and feelings of the past in the same way as the feelings and convictions of a completely different era».

Arturo Carlo Jemolo, «Stato e Chiesa in Italia», p. 23-24

he history of the relationship between the Catholic Church and modern culture is one of missed encounters, mutual accusations and anathemas, which at times became a veritable pitched battle. It is a history that began at least with Luther and the Counter-Reformation and continued, at varying speeds, until Vatican II - and still continues today. The Catholic Church's reaction to the modern spirit was fear, and from this came counterattacks, closures, and condemnations of this disturbing guest. Modern man was therefore not perceived by the Catholic Church as a son, certainly rebellious but still a son; instead, he was perceived as an enemy, as the greatest enemy, the Gog and Magog who could have destroyed Christianitas. We will never know what Modernity and the Church could have become if the enemy had been treated as an adolescent son, if its threats had also been read as a development of the evangelical seeds of the Middle Ages, albeit matured in ways and on soils different from those imagined by the hierarchies and theologians. In the lives of individuals and peoples, the most difficult art to learn is to recognize salvation that comes where and how we would never have thought or wanted it to.

[fulltext] =>

Even the process that led to Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum should be read within this failed encounter: "Leo XIII condemned modern thought, so bold in its judgment of religion and Catholicism, but he did not confront it: he judged it from the outside and from above, like his predecessor, he did not enter into it to analyze it, discern it, or break it down. The two stood facing each other all that time like two powerful armies, without coming into contact.“ These are the words of Romolo Murri, who continued: ”The pontificate of Leo XIII would have had a completely different character from what it had if the doctrinal documents were not what they are: rigid claims and systematic exposition, not a work of penetration into the modern world, of assimilation, of reintegration... Modern society has shown that it neither knows nor wants to persuade itself to abandon its ideas and ways in order to enter into those officially presented to it by the Church,“ because modern society ”wants to have its own experience" (Un papa, un secolo, e il cattolicesimo sociale, 1904, pp. 78-79). A modern experience that the Catholic Church did not understand and condemned, starting with freedom of conscience, its first ‘delusion’, as it was already defined by Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos, 1832), which led to the belief that ‘the faithful and the unbeliever, the orthodox and the heretic are all the same’. (M. Liberatore, La Chiesa e lo Stato, 1872, p. 48). A delusion, therefore, also called Liberalism. These ‘new things’ were not ‘good things’ for the Church, they were very bad; to these were soon added the great pressures of Socialism and Capitalism, and everything became complicated.

In this climate, Gioacchino Pecci, not yet Leo XIII, wrote in his letter for Lent in 1877: “A word that is so often misused by skeptics ... is the word ‘civilization’. This word has become a scourge” (Letters of Cardinal G. Pecci, 1880, pp. 119-120). And on the eve of Rerum Novarum, we read in La Civiltà Cattolica (an anonymous text, but probably by M. Liberatore): “There is no sensible man who does not foresee that, at this rate, Europe will overflow with the horrors of nihilism” (Year 1889, p. 257). Romolo Murri, on the other hand, hoped that the dawn of the 20th century would mark the beginning of something new, that ‘things’ would finally become ‘new’ and good. In other words, he hoped that Catholics would begin to “throw their ideas and their spirit into the forge of this experience of modern society, so that it might mature into a return to sanity, enlightened intentions, and a more intense religious life for humanity” (pp. 80-81). The path taken by Pius X, Leo XIII's successor, was not the one hoped for by Don Romolo Murri, as his personal biographical trajectory also testifies: two years after the publication of his book, Murri was suspended a divinis and then excommunicated in 1909. Pius X, beatified by Pius XII, exacerbated the anti-modernism already present in nineteenth-century Catholicism.

The genesis of Rerum Novarum is part of a very complex theological-social movement. After the Napoleonic period, the Catholic Church had begun, not without resistance, a partial theological and cultural renewal, centered on a return to St. Thomas and his theology. Rerum Novarum was not only the result of a return to the Thomist system and scholasticism, but we cannot understand it without Thomas and Thomism. Leo XIII began his pontificate by explicitly and ‘politically’ declaring his intention to return to Thomas. Aeterni Patris, of 1879, one of his first encyclicals (he wrote eighty-six), was in fact his theological and pastoral manifesto to “revive and restore to its original splendor the doctrine of St. Thomas Aquinas” (AP). Vincenzo Gioacchino Pecci (Vincenzo was the name his mother called him) encountered and embraced Thomism as early as 1828, thanks to the lessons of Luigi Taparelli d'Azeglio. In 1849, the Academy of Thomistic Philosophy was founded in Naples, and a few years later (1879), the magazine Divus Thomas was launched in Piacenza. Giuseppe Pecci, Gioacchino's brother, was also part of the Italian Thomist circle and founded the Academy of St. Thomas in Perugia (1859).

This theological elite realized that traditional, counter-reformist Catholic theology could not withstand the impact of modern thought. To try to face that cultural battle with some hope of not being annihilated, there was only one possibility: to stake everything on the best, most influential, and universally esteemed theologian: Thomas, the Doctor Angelicus, and therefore Aristotle. They were convinced that there was no better resource at their disposal. Thomas was already present in previous theological training (think of Spanish Scholasticism), but he was mixed with popular piety, the cult of saints, Augustine reinterpreted in a Platonic key, manuals for confessors, and the study of theology that was blocked by the reform of the Council of Trent. A relaunch was therefore needed, a systemic overview: “So that sacred theology may take on and assume the nature, form, and character of true science” (Leo XIII, Aeterni Patris). Neo-Thomism was thus born as a reform and innovation of the Church, as a reform of the training of priests. Thomism, however, did not interrupt that long modern season, which the Catholic Church experienced as an unbroken chain of errors from Luther onwards. Thomas did not become a means of dialogue between the Church and modernity, but an instrument of struggle.

When Cardinal Pecci became Leo XIII, he was already a Thomist. The presence of Thomas' philosophy in Rerum Novarum is therefore not attributable to the ideas of the professors who wrote the preparatory drafts. Leo chose them precisely because they were Thomists, as well as being the best in the Catholic world. One of these, certainly the most important and influential, was Father Matteo Liberatore. A native of Salerno like Antonio Genovesi (whom he ignored, although he certainly knew him), he was a Jesuit and one of the founders of Civiltà Cattolica (1850). He was a contemporary of Francesco Ferrara and Giacchino Pecci (a class of iron: all three died over the age of 80, Ferrara at 90 and Leo at 93). A brilliant writer and polemicist, he was one of the most brilliant thinkers of 19th-century Catholicism: “He was at the center of the most important moments in ecclesiastical life” (F. Francesco Dante, La civiltà cattolica e la Rerum Novarum, p. 49).

Towards the end of his life, in 1889, he wrote Principii di Economia Politica (Principles of Political Economy), a volume previewed in several articles published in La Civiltà Cattolica. Translated into English (1891) and French (1899), it had no impact on the economic science of the time. It was ignored by liberal economists. 1889 was also the year of the publication of Maffeo Pantaleoni's Principles of Pure Economics, the most influential textbook of that generation, written when the author was 32 years old: Liberatore was almost 80, another indicator of modernity. Liberatore was not an economist; his book is essentially a long economic homily, which left economic science exactly as he had found it, without even touching it. A treatise that perfectly symbolizes the different and divergent paths that Catholic social doctrine and modern economics had already taken. Reading the book, one realizes that it is a dialogue between the author and a few books—almost all of them at least fifty years old—in his study: Smith, Say, Minghetti, Bastiat, Malthus, Ricardo, Sismondi... There is no reference to Marx, who is hard to imagine in his library. The book is an excellent guide to understanding the approach of Rerum Novarum, where we find many of the ideas in this text by Liberatore. It is more useful to us today than it was to his contemporaries.

The tone of the book perfectly reflects that of the Church of his time: entirely defensive, and therefore polemical, aggressive, and nostalgic. The opening words are already strong and clear: “Modern liberalism is like a fly, which, wherever it alights, leaves a germ of corruption and stench” (p. 5). Liberalism does not coincide with economic liberalism - which Liberatore already calls capitalism - but, as B. Croce will explain later, the two are deeply related. The Catholic Church will hate cultural liberalism but will almost love economic liberalism.

The most interesting pages of the Treatise are those concerning private property, from which emerges the intention of the Church of the time to try to imagine the famous third way between socialism and capitalism. In reality, rather than a third way, it was an attempt to correct the first way, Capitalism, which in its basic social and philosophical structure was far preferred to Socialism, with a few adjustments (in employer-employee relations, in charity, and little else). The real enemy was therefore socialism, and capitalism appeared to be the lesser evil and perhaps even a good, especially because of its tenacious defense of private property and inequality among men as a natural and necessary condition—we will see this next Sunday. For now, let us just savor this sentence of his: "The most curious thing is that the advocates of equality boast of freedom. And they do not understand that freedom and equality are at odds with each other" (p. 163).

The third way inaugurated by Rerum Novarum thus became only the Catholic way to capitalism. Modernity, which was very frightening on a religious and social level (Liberalism and Socialism), was much less frightening in its capitalist guise. And today we see all the consequences.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-01-18 08:30:40 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-01-19 08:54:30 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-01-18 08:30:40 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/01\/19\/Anima_economica_02A_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/01\/16\/Anima_economica_02A_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 144 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9928 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-01-18 08:30:40 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 190 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20587:the-difficult-catholic-third-way-between-capitalism-and-socialism [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic Soul/2 - From neo-Thomism to withstand the impact of the dominant culture to the ideas of Father Liberatore that paved the way for “Rerum novarum”

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 18, 2026 

«It is an anti-historical attitude par excellence to consider the problems, opinions, and feelings of the past in the same way as the feelings and convictions of a completely different era».

Arturo Carlo Jemolo, «Stato e Chiesa in Italia», p. 23-24

he history of the relationship between the Catholic Church and modern culture is one of missed encounters, mutual accusations and anathemas, which at times became a veritable pitched battle. It is a history that began at least with Luther and the Counter-Reformation and continued, at varying speeds, until Vatican II - and still continues today. The Catholic Church's reaction to the modern spirit was fear, and from this came counterattacks, closures, and condemnations of this disturbing guest. Modern man was therefore not perceived by the Catholic Church as a son, certainly rebellious but still a son; instead, he was perceived as an enemy, as the greatest enemy, the Gog and Magog who could have destroyed Christianitas. We will never know what Modernity and the Church could have become if the enemy had been treated as an adolescent son, if its threats had also been read as a development of the evangelical seeds of the Middle Ages, albeit matured in ways and on soils different from those imagined by the hierarchies and theologians. In the lives of individuals and peoples, the most difficult art to learn is to recognize salvation that comes where and how we would never have thought or wanted it to.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
The (difficult) Catholic third way between capitalism and socialism

The (difficult) Catholic third way between capitalism and socialism

Economic Soul/2 - From neo-Thomism to withstand the impact of the dominant culture to the ideas of Father Liberatore that paved the way for “Rerum novarum” by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on January 18, 2026  «It is an anti-historical attitude par excellence to consider the problems, opini...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20567
    [title] => Economics and Italian Catholicism, a century and a half of “new things”
    [alias] => economics-and-italian-catholicism-a-century-and-a-half-of-new-things
    [introtext] => 

Economic soul/1 - From the thinking of Antonio Genovesi in the 18th century, heir to the medieval tradition, to the long eclipse of the 19th century. Until the 20th century

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 11, 2026

An important path to follow is that of a different reading of the history of economic thought, and in particular of the Italian tradition, as is already beginning to be done, reevaluating Genovesi and other civil economists. If we were able to identify an Italian tradition, different from the one that has become official [mainstream], which has its own genealogy, this would be an operation of primary importance.”

Giacomo Becattini, “Human well-being and ‘project’ enterprises,” 2002 

There have been periods in European civilization when the love, pain, experiences, and experiments of Christians have generated words of flesh that have then become papal encyclicals, documents, magazines, and books that have universalized and generalized that civil love and pain. We would not have had Rerum Novarum (1891) – or it would have been much poorer and less influential – without the cooperative movement, rural banks, the trade union movement, workers' leagues, mutual aid societies, the Opera dei Congressi (Congress Work)... Of course, the theological ideas of Father Matteo Liberatore and the socio-economic ideas of the young professor Giuseppe Toniolo were also important, but it was first the facts that sifted, discerned, selected, and valued the ideas of theologians, philosophers, economists, and then popes. In Christianity, it is not ideas that validate facts, but the opposite. ‘Reality is superior to the idea’ is not only a principle very dear to Pope Francis, but above all a synthesis of Christianity, of its humanism based on the Word made flesh - the Logos did not enter history by becoming an idea, an ideology or a book, but by becoming a child. Ideas are alive, life-giving and capable of transforming the world only when they are flesh.

[fulltext] =>

Therefore, the impact, quality, and transformative capacity of a Church document depend greatly, almost entirely, on the quality and generative capacity of entrepreneurs, cooperators, politicians, citizens, scholars, and above all, entire Christian communities, who live and experience new things in their individual and collective flesh. The ‘sympathetic’ ink of important Church documents is the blood of witnesses and martyrs. We are all awaiting Pope Leo's first social encyclical, and we are well aware that this document cannot create reality: it can see it, give it wings, amplify it, it can turn some small ‘already’ into ‘not yet’; but once again it will be the reality that the Church and humanity are already experiencing that will give quality and impact to Leo XIV's encyclicals, as was the case with Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum. Without this ‘flesh’ and this life, encyclicals are paper documents that do not improve the economic and social world.

The series of articles we are beginning today is an exploration of the intertwining of economics and Catholicism in contemporary Italy, particularly during that long century that took us from the mid-19th century to the end of the 20th century, passing through socialism, modernism, wars, and fascism with its ‘corporatist’ economic doctrine, which we will also deal with. Economics and the Catholic religion will therefore be the two axes of this reflection. In some articles, economics will prevail, in others religion, but in all there will be dialogue between the two.

To speak of Italian economic tradition means above all to speak of civil economy, which is the name that economic science took from its origins with Antonio Genovesi in the mid-18th century, when an economic-civil tradition that began in the Middle Ages with monasticism, merchants, the Franciscans and their doctrines on usury, their Monti di Pietà and Monti frumentari came to maturity. With the birth of the unified state, that ancient tradition of Italian (but also European) thought underwent a fracture and then a long eclipse. And that is where we start.

Until the early 19th century, the Italian tradition of civil economy was still alive and respected. Between 1802 and 1816, Pietro Custodi of Milan published the ‘Collezione degli Economisti Classici Italiani’ (Collection of Italian Classical Economists) in fifty volumes, a fundamental work for the dissemination of Italian economic thought in the new universities and among the new politicians. But when, in 1850, on the initiative of Francesco Ferrara, who was the most influential economist of his generation, the Biblioteca dell'Economista (Economist's Library) was created, only one of the 13 volumes (the third) was dedicated to Italian economists. The cultural climate was, in fact, changing rapidly and radically. In his introduction to that third volume, Ferrara has kind words for Genovesi, whom he, not surprisingly, places as the first author of the volume: ‘The oldest chair of economics in Italy, and one of the oldest in Europe, is that of Naples, established in 1754 by Genovesi’. He then provides some biographical notes on Genovesi: "Unpopular with the monks and priests of the schools, whose ignorance served as a dark backdrop to the splendid fame of this innovative priest, who, avoiding Latin as much as possible, relying on arguments that rebelled against the strict forms of syllogism, quoting English and French authors, pronouncing with equally impassive lips the truth of the Bible and the passage of the heretical writer, was nevertheless enthusiastically frequented by an eager youth... This was Genovesi" (Vol. 3, pp. V-VI). Genovesi, also on the explicit recommendation of Intieri, the financier of the chair, taught in Italian (not Latin), an innovative fact that did not escape Ferrara: “According to the custom of the time, Genovesi began the next day to dictate his lessons to the young people; and he himself recounts that it seemed a marvel to hear a professor speaking Italian from his chair for the first time,” and denounced “the fault of the Italians in holding their language in very low esteem” (pp. VII-VIII), a fault that continues and grows today. So much for the fine words about Genovesi and his Economia civile.

Despite his personal esteem for Genovesi, however, Ferrara believed that the true science of economics was now only that of the English and the French. Genovesi and the Italians were merely prehistory, the ancien régime: “The merits of the first foundation of economics belong to the Englishman Smith or the Frenchman Turgot, not to Genovesi” (p. XXXVI). The Italian tradition, in his opinion, had not been able to enter modernity because it was still imprisoned by moral and political concerns. Economics as a science independent of both morality and the ‘prince’ had instead been founded by Adam Smith in his Wealth of Nations (1776): “The ancient Italian school offers nothing that might recommend it to our preference... I will share the sentiment of national self-love, but I will continue to study Smith in order to learn economics” (p. XXXV). And so he concludes coherently: “If the Biblioteca dell'economista had been assigned a less ambitious purpose than it had, perhaps none of the Italian authors now included in this volume would have been included” (p. LXX). This was a very strong and clear thesis, which proved decisive.

Genovesi's non-modernity lay, therefore, in his choice to frame issues in a ‘broad and complex’ manner. His mistake was one of method: he failed to look at wealth from an ‘abstract and absolute point of view, but rather from that of general welfare’ or public happiness. For Ferrara, on the other hand, Smith was the true founder of modern economic science, precisely because he abandoned this ‘broad and complex approach’ to focus solely on economic variables - it is the birth of homo oeconomicus (more in Ferrara than in Smith): ‘Smith's merit lies in having felt the need to abandon ... broad and complex formulas before others did’. And this was ‘an immense step forward’, it was ‘the Cogito of economics’ (p. XL).

For Ferrara, the reference to 18th-century Italian economists was therefore an attempt to ‘cover up the nullity of the present with memories of the past’ (p. LXX). The nullity was obviously that of his present—the mid-19th century was certainly not a time of great theoretical talent for Italian economics—but the temptation to return to a noble past when the present is poor (as ours is) is always present. Therefore, Ferrara's warning is also important for us today, an invitation not to console ourselves by remembering the great fathers in the time of the little grandchildren.

Francesco Ferrara was a staunch liberal economist and a child of the century of Darwin, Marx, and positivism, a colleague, in method, of John S. Mill. For him, ‘true’ economic science could only arise by renouncing the ‘whole’ in order to study the ‘fragment,’ leaving aside ‘public happiness’ to focus on production costs and consumer utility. Ferrara was the bridge that Italian civil economics of the 18th century had to cross to reach the second half of the 19th century. It was a very narrow bridge, almost a needle's eye, which allowed very little of that great classical heritage to pass through, too little for any trace of it to remain.

After this passage, civil economy left academia, but - and here is a key point - it also left the thinking and action of the Catholic world, its economists and sociologists, cooperators, trade unionists, popes, and bishops. In fact, starting with the leader Toniolo, the Catholic tradition that would inspire Rerum Novarum and then Social Doctrine would not reconnect with Genovesi or Civil Economy, which were ignored or considered too modern and distant from the neo-Thomism that would guide many documents. We cannot understand the Social Doctrine of the Church between the 19th and 20th centuries unless we bear in mind that it developed during Pius IX's Non expedit and the modernist controversy of Pius X and his successors until Vatican II. This was a climate of closure to the modern world and its demands for a scientific study of the Bible, not least because these demands came mainly from Protestant countries. Added to this already complex picture was the birth and development of socialism and Marxism, which further complicated dialogue with the past and with the contemporary world, occupying much of the energy of Catholics, probably too much.

The disappearance of Italian civil tradition from the thinking of the Church is one of the reasons for the failure of Catholicism to engage with modernity and for its anti-modernism, which are still a serious problem for the Catholic world and its reflection on the economy and society. Genovesi, who, according to Ferrara, was too little modern because he was fascinated by ‘broad and complex formulas’, became instead too modern and with categories too broad and complex to fit into the Thomism that Leo XIII had placed at the center of the Church's thinking. Along with civil economy, Franciscans, monasticism, Tuscan merchants, pawnshops and grain banks, Bernardino da Feltre and Muratori, together with a serious biblical perspective, were also left out of Catholic social doctrine. All this was shrouded in a dark night that lasted almost two centuries, which we will discuss in these articles. During this long night, some angels slipped in along with many ghosts, which still populate the dreams of the Catholic world. Perhaps it is time to wake up.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-01-11 01:01:51 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-01-13 08:51:51 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-01-11 01:01:51 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/01\/12\/Anima_economica_02_ant1.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/01\/10\/Anima_economica_01_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 158 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9867 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-01-11 01:01:51 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 190 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20567:economics-and-italian-catholicism-a-century-and-a-half-of-new-things [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic soul/1 - From the thinking of Antonio Genovesi in the 18th century, heir to the medieval tradition, to the long eclipse of the 19th century. Until the 20th century

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 11, 2026

An important path to follow is that of a different reading of the history of economic thought, and in particular of the Italian tradition, as is already beginning to be done, reevaluating Genovesi and other civil economists. If we were able to identify an Italian tradition, different from the one that has become official [mainstream], which has its own genealogy, this would be an operation of primary importance.”

Giacomo Becattini, “Human well-being and ‘project’ enterprises,” 2002 

There have been periods in European civilization when the love, pain, experiences, and experiments of Christians have generated words of flesh that have then become papal encyclicals, documents, magazines, and books that have universalized and generalized that civil love and pain. We would not have had Rerum Novarum (1891) – or it would have been much poorer and less influential – without the cooperative movement, rural banks, the trade union movement, workers' leagues, mutual aid societies, the Opera dei Congressi (Congress Work)... Of course, the theological ideas of Father Matteo Liberatore and the socio-economic ideas of the young professor Giuseppe Toniolo were also important, but it was first the facts that sifted, discerned, selected, and valued the ideas of theologians, philosophers, economists, and then popes. In Christianity, it is not ideas that validate facts, but the opposite. ‘Reality is superior to the idea’ is not only a principle very dear to Pope Francis, but above all a synthesis of Christianity, of its humanism based on the Word made flesh - the Logos did not enter history by becoming an idea, an ideology or a book, but by becoming a child. Ideas are alive, life-giving and capable of transforming the world only when they are flesh.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
Economics and Italian Catholicism, a century and a half of “new things”

Economics and Italian Catholicism, a century and a half of “new things”

Economic soul/1 - From the thinking of Antonio Genovesi in the 18th century, heir to the medieval tradition, to the long eclipse of the 19th century. Until the 20th century by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on January 11, 2026 “An important path to follow is that of a different reading of th...