Economic soul

stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20630
    [title] => Fanfani's criticism of capitalism and the temptation to return to the past
    [alias] => fanfani-s-criticism-of-capitalism-and-the-temptation-to-return-to-the-past
    [introtext] => 

Economic Soul/6 - Catholicism's complex relationship with modernity in the development of the Church's social doctrine

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on February 15, 2026

 

The relationship between Catholicism, modernity, fascism, economics, and society in recent centuries is a rough and little-explored territory. Every hermeneutic hypothesis is a map, an essential tool for attempting to venture into it, aware that we have in our hands an incomplete and partial geographical map. A map is not a photograph of the forest, nor is it a fraction of that ‘1 to 1’ map of the Empire imagined by the genius of Borges. It is only a humble piece of paper, with many holes and dots connecting areas that are not described because they are unknown, some of which can even lead us to the edge of a precipice - both the writer and the reader. But there are no other good ways, the only one left is the apologetic one of ideological a priori and narrative myths, which is always the most loved by all empires and their nostalgics.

[fulltext] =>

Leo XIII and then Pius XI, dedicating encyclicals to the ‘social question’, were innovators, Leo first and foremost. They were innovators because they said that it was an essential part of the Church's mission to get to the heart of the economy, work, and social and political dynamics. They therefore asked important and good questions of Catholics and everyone else. The answers they offered within the constraints of their time have, however, been overtaken by history, partly because they were born in a climate of fear and defense, which are always bad advisors to any writer on social issues. During times of great fear, both individual and collective, the first path that lies before us is that of returning to familiar and reassuring ground, and this is not the right path.

To continue our journey, let us look at the work of Amintore Fanfani, professor of economic history and economic doctrines during Fascism at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, oriented in those early years by the ‘medievalist’ program. Father Gemelli saw Fanfani as a star, and when he was still only 25 years old, he entrusted him with the direction of the prestigious Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali (International Journal of Social Sciences). His first and most important works are dedicated to the search for a foundation for capitalism, whose spirit, for Fanfani, is not good but the evil fruit of the decline and betrayal of the authentically Christian spirit that had sustained medieval Christianitas. He thus traces back to the late Middle Ages an economic culture radically different from what would become the capitalist spirit. He found the unspoiled spirit of the economy in that distant land where the modern germ had not yet entered the European organism, infecting it. The early medieval economic spirit was good because it was pre-capitalist, and therefore social, virtuous, communal, ordered by guilds, and protected under the wing of the Church, the theology of Thomas Aquinas, and Scholasticism. This Christian order of the first communes and the first merchants, so dear to Dante, would later be distorted by the “new people and sudden gains” (If XVI,73) that “produce and spread the accursed flower” (If IX,130). A turning point that began very early, in the 14th century, with the development of Humanism. The evil breeze of modern man and therefore of capitalism slipped into those cracks in the wall of the sacred medieval order. A failure that occurred well before the Reformation of Luther and Calvin. Fanfani could not agree with the theory of the great sociologist Max Weber, who a few years earlier in his The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism had linked the birth of capitalism to the Calvinist spirit. For Fanfani, the capitalist spirit is neither Christian nor Catholic; it is a betrayal of both. Instead, it arose as a side effect of the moral and religious decadence of modern man, and the Reformation did nothing more than continue that misguided and older revolution (let us not forget that that period of Catholicism was also anti-Protestant). Fanfani's interest in the origins of capitalism can already be found in his thesis at the Catholic University: “The enemy of capitalism cannot be a system in which economic reason is the last resort; the enemy of capitalism can only be a system that places other criteria above economic ones” (A. Fanfani, Effetti economici dello scisma inglese, 1929-30). The pre-capitalist age, therefore, was “the era in which well-defined social institutions, such as the Church, the State, and the Guild, became guardians of an economic order not based on criteria of economic and individual utility. A typical institution of the era is the guild” (Cattolicesimo e protestantesimo nella formazione storica del capitalismo, 1934, p. 34). Fanfani therefore categorically denies that “Catholicism, as a body of doctrine, favored the emergence of the capitalist conception and thus the advent of capitalism” (p. 98). He then asks: “When and where did capitalism arise? In Protestant countries, after Luther's rebellion?” (p. 111). His answer is clearly no. The birth of the capitalist spirit predates this and is instead found in “circumstances that led individuals to act differently from how most of their contemporaries acted or how everyone should have acted” (p. 118). In particular, the development of long-distance trade played an important role. In foreign countries, far from the eyes of the community, “there is less incentive for merchants to act fairly” (pp. 119-122).

All this was therefore fully consistent with Toniolo's project, with Gemelli, Thomism, Leo XIII, and Pius XI and their cultural project of restoring the medieval order, its spirit, and its guilds, all essential elements of paradise lost. The Christian social project was therefore supposed to be a way of overcoming capitalism, but instead of moving forward, the aim was to overcome it by going backwards. According to Fanfani, the economic order was based on voluntarism (strong state intervention), thus putting an end to naturalism, i.e., liberalism (Fanfani, Storia delle dottrine economiche, 1942). In this vision, Fanfani considers Rerum Novarum a manifesto of voluntarism (“Rerum Novarum, volontarismo e naturalismo economico,” Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 1941).

It is not surprising, then, that the young Fanfani enthusiastically adhered for many years to fascist corporatism, which he saw as the apotheosis of voluntarism and the overcoming of capitalism, a corporatism that Fanfani saw as a development of Christian corporatism: 'Corporatism has denied the essence of capitalism... If there is a country where capitalism is coming to an end and a new system is advancing, that country is Italy. I consider the corporations and all corporate legislation to be profoundly innovative" (Declino del capitalismo e significato del corporativismo, 1934). He also collaborated with the School of Fascist Mysticism (L. Pomante, 2024), created because, in the words of its founder, “fascism has its own ‘mysticism’ in that it has a set of moral, social, and political postulates, categorical and dogmatic, which alone can save humanity in crisis” (N. Giani, 1930). On February 27, 1937, Cardinal A. I. Schuster of Milan visited and gave a sermon at that school, while the Catholic newspaper L'avvenire d'Italia (a predecessor of our newspaper) openly opposed this new ‘mysticism’ (April 9, 1930).

What particularly fascinated those Catholics was the organic and hierarchical vision of fascist society, because it was similar to that of medieval Christianity: “Fascist corporatism has returned to the idea of an organic constitution of society” (A. Fanfani, Il problema corporativo nella sua evoluzione storica, 1942). It has returned... returning, looking back to find the dreamt-of ‘third way’: ‘Corporations were a perfectly Italian form of association, and we owe many of the magnificent treasures that are the glory and splendor of Italy to our old corporations’ (Mussolini, ‘Speech to foreign journalists’, November 1923).

In his lectures at the Fascist Colonial Institute (1936-37), Fanfani interpreted fascism in messianic terms as the return of the empire, even more explicitly in an article in his magazine: 'It took our people only fourteen years to cover the intermediate stages on the road to empire that others took centuries to cover: political pacification, reconciliation with the Church, Roman Catholic and fascist education of the youth: these are the achievements that strengthened our will and paved the way for victory. We were among the last to establish political unity. And the last, alone, will become the first. This is confirmed by the reappearance of Roman virtue on earth, corroborated by the consecration of Christianity“ (”Da soli!" [Alone!], Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 1936).

The fascist regime collapsed. The corporative institutions met the same fate. But the corporative mentality, with its search for a middle ground and restoration between capitalism and socialism characterized by a strong state presence, did not disappear after 1945, partly because it existed well before 1922. Traces of it can be found in republican Italy, as we shall see. Just as the Church did not overcome its nostalgia for the old regime and the temptation to look back.

We know from the Bible that when the people imagine a way back, if they actually do so, they end up crossing the sea on the wrong side, where the Nile, bricks, and pharaohs await them. Pope Prevost chose the name Leo to reiterate that even today the social question is central to the Church. And this is a very important signal. It is to be hoped—and there are reasons to do so—that this time it will not be fear of ‘new things’ that sets the tone and words of the new encyclicals. There is an infinite need for a generous and kind view of what humanity is experiencing, including its contradictions and risks. The promised land, if it exists, can only be found within our time, on its horizon.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-02-15 05:24:20 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-02-19 15:50:40 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-02-15 05:24:20 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/02\/13\/Anima_economica_06_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/02\/13\/Anima_economica_06_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 51 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9350 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-02-15 05:24:20 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 467 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20630:fanfani-s-criticism-of-capitalism-and-the-temptation-to-return-to-the-past [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic Soul/6 - Catholicism's complex relationship with modernity in the development of the Church's social doctrine

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on February 15, 2026

 

The relationship between Catholicism, modernity, fascism, economics, and society in recent centuries is a rough and little-explored territory. Every hermeneutic hypothesis is a map, an essential tool for attempting to venture into it, aware that we have in our hands an incomplete and partial geographical map. A map is not a photograph of the forest, nor is it a fraction of that ‘1 to 1’ map of the Empire imagined by the genius of Borges. It is only a humble piece of paper, with many holes and dots connecting areas that are not described because they are unknown, some of which can even lead us to the edge of a precipice - both the writer and the reader. But there are no other good ways, the only one left is the apologetic one of ideological a priori and narrative myths, which is always the most loved by all empires and their nostalgics.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
Fanfani's criticism of capitalism and the temptation to return to the past

Fanfani's criticism of capitalism and the temptation to return to the past

Economic Soul/6 - Catholicism's complex relationship with modernity in the development of the Church's social doctrine by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on February 15, 2026   The relationship between Catholicism, modernity, fascism, economics, and society in recent centuries is a rough and...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20623
    [title] => The doctrine that looked to the Middle Ages generated works and subsidiarity
    [alias] => the-doctrine-that-looked-to-the-middle-ages-generated-works-and-subsidiarity
    [introtext] => 

Economic Soul/5 - The impact of “Rerum Novarum” and “Quadragesimo Anno” exceeded initial expectations. Leo XIII and Pius XI proposed a “third way” between capitalism and socialism as a form of restoration, giving rise to cooperatives, schools, rural credit unions, and mutual aid societies.

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on February 8, 2026

The history of the impact of the first season of the Church's Social Doctrine is a long and important episode of heterogenesis of ends, that is, of effects very different from those intended by those who had wanted and guided it. Leo XIII and Pius XI, in fact, wrote about the ‘social question’ because they were concerned about the growth of the socialist movement and its promises to eliminate private property. They thus proposed to Catholics a ‘third way’ between capitalism and socialism, understood as a return to and restoration of the medieval social order and its ‘guilds (Gremi) of arts and crafts’. Those were the intentions of the writers; what happened, however, was the explosion of a great movement of social change that contributed decisively to preparing modern Italy and Europe, reducing inequalities, and overcoming the old regime. Reality surpassed the idea. The years between Rerum Novarum (1891) and Quadragesimo Anno (1931) saw the birth of thousands of social, economic, and political initiatives by Catholics, who did not seek the promised land by looking back: they achieved it by looking ahead to the horizon. Instead, it was fascism that took up the invitation to reconstitute the ancient medieval guilds, an effect that was not intended by either the popes or the fascists. 

[fulltext] =>

In reality, there were profound differences between Catholic and fascist corporatism. For example, fascist corporatism arose from revolutionary syndicalism and Hegelian thought, and was radically statist and anti-subsidiary. But the similarities and concordances were also significant and equally real. The fascist guild was an ideological vision built on forced concord and imposed harmony between the interests of capitalists and those of workers. This harmony began in the workplace: “Finally, a new sense of human dignity was needed, one that would establish the moral and social premise of a legal system that places work at the center of the economy and, while recognizing individual interests, coordinates them in accordance with other, increasingly general interests” (F.M. Pacces, Introduzione agli studi di aziendaria, 1935). Corporatism therefore presented itself as a defense of work, wages, and workers—a theme very dear to the Church.

Giuseppe Bottai, one of its main architects, saw the corporation as “the institution through which the collaboration of different classes and categories is realized. Employers and workers and professionals, artists and craftsmen, and even public employees can march together in unity and harmony without lingering in the treacherous shadow of democratic tradition” (La Carta del lavoro, 1927). Years earlier, Giuseppe Toniolo had proposed “a corporate ideal, in which both elements currently in conflict, capitalist owners on the one hand and workers with no assets on the other, would be represented, and in which the interests of employers and workers would find harmonious agreement” (Indirizzi e concetti sociali, 1900). Throughout his life, Toniolo never tired of praising medieval guilds with a view to proposing their restoration: “Here we see the establishment of intermediate bodies between individuals and the universal, that is, between individuals and the state, whose development, defense, and growth were a singular merit of the Church... Intermediate forces that prevented the clash between the two extremes” (1893). The guilds, therefore, would have brought about the harmonious cooperation of all classes for the common good, the longed-for social order, clearly pyramidal and perfect - these were the years in which the Church once again defined itself as ‘societas perfecta’ (Leo XIII, Immortale Dei).

If we carefully study the call for a return to the medieval guild launched by Catholic social doctrine, we realize that it is an expression of something much deeper than just economics. It is part of the Catholic Church's complicated relationship with the modern world, and therefore of the restoration of medieval Christianity. The ‘reconstruction of the social order’ is also the subtitle of Quadragesimo Anno, but it had been advocated decades earlier by Toniolo: ‘The program of 'restoration’ of the social order remains designated as the therapy for the diagnosis' of modern disease. Therefore, “it is urgent today to restore the Christian social order that the Church had admirably developed and matured over the centuries through titanic struggles: a social origin that the Reformation has transfigured and broken down step by step to the point of today's atomism.” And so, as the best way forward, “it is advisable to reconnect with the traditions of the Middle Ages, which have been obscured, opposed, and severed since the day of the Reformation” (1893). The return to the Middle Ages was the means, the end was restoration. For Toniolo and his school (Fanfani), the root of the decline of the social order predates the Reformation: “Luther's heresy demonstrates its filiation from Humanism” because, quoting Erasmus, Luther opened “the egg that had already been laid long ago”: the egg of the centrality of man and his “free will,” where the origin of all the evils of modernity, which led to Liberalism and Socialism, would be found.

And here we should open a serious reflection on this bizarre Catholic reading of history and Humanism. In this regard, on June 8, 1944, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote to his friend Eberhard from the Berlin prison of Tegel, a few months before being hanged by the Nazis: "I consider the attacks of Christian apologetics on the adult world: first, absurd; second, poor; third, unchristian. Absurd: because they seem to me to be an attempt to bring an individual who has now become a man back to puberty, that is, to bring him back to dependence on things from which he has in fact become independent, to drive him back to problems that, in fact, are no longer problems for him" (Resistance and Surrender, edited by I. Mancini). And on July 17, in another letter, he continued the dialogue: “God as a moral, political, and scientific working hypothesis has been eliminated and superseded; but also as a philosophical and religious working hypothesis... And where, at this point, is the space for God? ask timid spirits; and not knowing how to find an answer, they condemn en masse the evolution that has put them in this calamitous situation.” So they seek “possible emergency exits from this space that has become too cramped,” among them “a death-defying leap backward into the Middle Ages.” But "returning to it can only be a gesture of desperation, accomplished only at the price of intellectual honesty. It is a pipe dream: ‘oh, if only I knew where the road back was, the long road to the land of children’. This road does not exist - in any case, it does not pass through the arbitrary renunciation of inner honesty." These attempts are therefore absurd, poor, and above all unchristian, at least not consistent with the spirit of the Gospel (Christianity has never been only the Gospel).

The Catholic Church, in its institutions, failed, at least until Vatican II (and beyond), to read the process of adulthood in men and women that began at the end of the Middle Ages as a process intrinsic to the very logic of the Gospel, like a tree growing from the very seed of Revelation. It was very afraid of that child who had become a man, and for many centuries did everything it could to bring him back to the infantile stage, within that hierarchical order where everything was simpler, not least because at the top there were bishops, monks, and popes, almost always an essential and integral part of that hierarchical and unequal order. So, instead of looking at the growth of a child as the happiest event in all of existence, the post-medieval Church did not recognize in that adult face the same face of the beloved child. And so it perpetrated a sort of incest, trying to prevent that child from growing up, becoming autonomous and free. For at least half a millennium, it dreamed of a world that no longer existed. Dreams that, from time to time, became nightmares.

But—and here is the really good news—the Church is not only that which is marked and defined by documents, books, and magisterial directives. The Kingdom of Heaven is vaster, deeper, and higher than that of temples and palaces. And so, while Leo XIII and Pius XI wrote that inequality was unavoidable in society (“It is impossible to remove social inequalities from the world”: Rerum Novarum, §14), thousands of Catholics, lay people, religious, nuns, and parish priests gave life to cooperatives, rural credit unions, and mutual aid societies. The cooperative movement between the 19th and 20th centuries was a great tool for reducing inequalities, a true and serious ‘third way’, because it questioned property rights and profits. And when property rights change in a company, we are already beyond capitalism. What followed Rerum Novarum was truly a season of authentic economic prophecy, which, in the Catholic sphere, remains unsurpassed.

But there is more. Countless ‘works’ generated by the founders and foundresses of religious congregations invented the education of poor boys and girls and created the most beautiful ‘playground’ for poor children: the school. This was an extraordinary and wonderful achievement in Italy, Europe, and the missions, because the countries that today have the lowest levels of inequality are those that yesterday invested most in public and universal education (Thomas Piketty).

The economic and social miracle of the 20th century was also the result of poor children who, thanks to charisma, were able to study, also thanks to the impetus given by the first social encyclicals. Perhaps those popes wanted something else, but, without meaning to, they gave rise to something fantastic, for the Church, for the poor, for everyone. The heterogenesis of ends is also another name for Providence.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-02-08 04:08:18 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-02-12 11:29:15 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-02-08 04:08:18 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/02\/06\/Anima_economica_05_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/02\/06\/Anima_economica_05_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 114 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 8873 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-02-08 04:08:18 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 467 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20623:the-doctrine-that-looked-to-the-middle-ages-generated-works-and-subsidiarity [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic Soul/5 - The impact of “Rerum Novarum” and “Quadragesimo Anno” exceeded initial expectations. Leo XIII and Pius XI proposed a “third way” between capitalism and socialism as a form of restoration, giving rise to cooperatives, schools, rural credit unions, and mutual aid societies.

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on February 8, 2026

The history of the impact of the first season of the Church's Social Doctrine is a long and important episode of heterogenesis of ends, that is, of effects very different from those intended by those who had wanted and guided it. Leo XIII and Pius XI, in fact, wrote about the ‘social question’ because they were concerned about the growth of the socialist movement and its promises to eliminate private property. They thus proposed to Catholics a ‘third way’ between capitalism and socialism, understood as a return to and restoration of the medieval social order and its ‘guilds (Gremi) of arts and crafts’. Those were the intentions of the writers; what happened, however, was the explosion of a great movement of social change that contributed decisively to preparing modern Italy and Europe, reducing inequalities, and overcoming the old regime. Reality surpassed the idea. The years between Rerum Novarum (1891) and Quadragesimo Anno (1931) saw the birth of thousands of social, economic, and political initiatives by Catholics, who did not seek the promised land by looking back: they achieved it by looking ahead to the horizon. Instead, it was fascism that took up the invitation to reconstitute the ancient medieval guilds, an effect that was not intended by either the popes or the fascists. 

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
The doctrine that looked to the Middle Ages generated works and subsidiarity

The doctrine that looked to the Middle Ages generated works and subsidiarity

Economic Soul/5 - The impact of “Rerum Novarum” and “Quadragesimo Anno” exceeded initial expectations. Leo XIII and Pius XI proposed a “third way” between capitalism and socialism as a form of restoration, giving rise to cooperatives, schools, rural credit unions, and mutual aid societies. by Luigi...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20608
    [title] => A Church that enters history. Between social justice and subsidiarity
    [alias] => a-church-that-enters-history-between-social-justice-and-subsidiarity
    [introtext] => 

Economic Soul/4 - The project to create a credible Christian alternative to socialism and liberalism within its own time and absorbing its tensions

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on February 1, 2026

After the publication of Rerum Novarum, the economic, political, and social practices of Catholics experienced a colorful and lively civil spring. Workers' associations, mutual aid societies, and Catholic trade unions multiplied, and cooperatives and rural credit unions exploded in particular. The effects of the encyclical exceeded expectations, because reality is always greater than the idea of reality, and imposes itself with its indomitable freedom. On the intellectual front, Catholic economists and sociologists gave rise to a new and intense season of studies, newspapers, and cultural institutions. Their forefather in Italy was Giuseppe Toniolo, the most influential economist in the Church after Rerum Novarum and the most important interpreter of Leo XIII's teachings. Toniolo made his best scientific contributions to economic history during the first part of his career (the 1880s). His work as a theoretical economist, on the other hand, was modest and not appreciated by the best economists - Pantaleoni wrote to Pareto in 1909: “In Pisa, economics is being murdered by the good Toniolo” (Letters).

[fulltext] =>

His reading of history was perfectly consistent with that of Leo and with neo-Thomism. The breaking point and beginning of the Italian and European decline is identified in Humanism, which he reads as a pagan phenomenon and as the decline of Scholasticism. It was in the fifteenth century that the great mistake was made, when “the transition from the Christian Middle Ages to the modern age, from the social order matured by the Church to the human social order of pure reason” (1893) took place. With Humanism, the goal “is man, where utility inevitably prevails, ready to degenerate into selfishness.” The growth of man was interpreted as the decline of God (and vice versa), as if the human-divine game were a zero-sum game (-1/+1), a thesis that we unfortunately find in much Catholic thought of the Counter-Reformation.

This created a natural convergence between Toniolo, the historian of the Florentine economy, centered around the ‘arts and crafts guilds’, and Leo XIII, who pointed to those medieval institutions as the solution to the socialist class struggle and the overcoming of liberal individualism. This restorative tendency in Toniolo's thinking was also noted by Alcide De Gasperi: “In the urgency to oppose the future socialist state with a Christian ideal, he perhaps exaggerated the importance of medieval municipal and corporate democracy: the bright aspects of an era, whose shadows had not been sufficiently highlighted” (1949). The search for a ‘third way’ was therefore the great project of Toniolo and his school, convinced that Christian social reconstruction would only succeed if Catholics took care to ‘combat, on the one hand, the individualistic and liberalist economy and, on the other, the pantheistic economy or state socialism’ (1886). It is not surprising, then, that Father Agostino Gemelli, founder of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, titled the first article of Vita e Pensiero ‘Medievalism’, an article that begins with these words: “Here is our program: we are Medievalists.” He continued: "Let me explain. We feel deeply distant from, indeed hostile to, so-called ‘modern culture’“ (1914).

In 1903, Pius X ascended to the papal throne, followed by Benedict XV in 1914. Their major themes were the reaction to Modernism and the First World War (”the useless slaughter"). Pius X's fight against Modernism, defined as “the synthesis of all heresies” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 1907), is a perfect expression of the anti-modern line begun by his predecessors in the 19th century. Pius X devoted many of his resources to this struggle, creating a new inquisition structure to stem the epidemic, the Sodalitium Pianum, a secret network of inspectors to identify and report theologians suspected of Modernism. It was Pius XI, however, who explicitly continued the doctrine on social issues. The occasion was provided by the anniversary of Rerum Novarum, the Quadragesimo Anno (1931), an encyclical which, as Father Gemelli pointed out, “is not only the most solemn exaltation and the most authoritative commentary on Rerum Novarum, but also, above all, a systematic development” (1931). Pius XI defined Rerum Novarum as the ‘magna carta’ (QA §39) of the social order, because it had shown the working masses a new path “without asking for help from either liberalism or socialism, the former having proved completely incapable of providing a legitimate solution to the social question, the latter proposing a remedy that was far worse than the evil itself and would have exposed human society to even greater dangers” (§10). Pius XI thus reaffirms the social vision of the Church as a third way that seeks to “diligently avoid striking a double rock” (§46), navigating between Scylla (liberalism) and Charybdis (socialism): “Incidit in Scyllam cupiens vitare Charybdim” (Liberatore, 1889). The important ‘principle of subsidiarity’ already present in Rerum Novarum is re-proposed and developed. Above all, however, Pius XI reintroduces (§ 85, 86, 88...) the Corporations of Arts and Crafts, the Leonine solution to the socialist class conflict and capitalism: “He wanted the first place among these institutions to be given to corporations that embrace either workers alone or workers and employers together” (§29).

In the meantime, however, something extremely important had happened. Among the ‘new things’ was Fascism in Italy, and in 1927, with the ‘Carta del Lavoro’ (Charter of Labor), the corporative reform of the state came into force. Thus, ‘corporative social economy’ had become ‘a fundamental aspect of the political doctrine renewed and reconstituted by Fascism’ (Gino Arias, p. 5). Corporatism was based on the Aristotelian-Thomist tradition: ‘The organic doctrine of society, conceived as a real unity, distinct from the individuals and smaller groups that are part of it, is Aristotelian,’ writes economist Gino Arias. And therefore, ‘the superiority of the public good over the private good, concepts widely developed in the political doctrine of St. Thomas’. Corporatism thus presented itself as a true “third way” between socialism and capitalism: “The corporative economy is the negation of the hedonistic premise common to both liberalism and socialism” (G. Arias, Economia corporativa). These premises and promises were very similar to those of the young Social Doctrine of the Church.

In 1929, the Lateran Pacts were signed. Pius XI therefore wanted to add a few paragraphs to the Encyclical on the Italian situation, i.e., on fascism and its corporatism. Here they are: “Recently, as everyone knows, a special trade union and corporative organization was initiated” (§92). Then: “A little reflection is enough to see the advantages of the system as briefly indicated: peaceful collaboration between classes, repression of socialist organizations and attempts” (§96). Finally, medieval nostalgia: “There was a time when a social order existed which, although not entirely perfect and irreproachable in every respect, nevertheless conformed in some way to right reason, according to the conditions and needs of the times. Now that order has long since disappeared” (§98), and therefore... satisfaction with its reconstitution.

These texts are still embarrassing. Quadragesimo Anno ended up encouraging, or at least not discouraging, the adherence of many, too many Catholic economists to fascist corporatist doctrine. Among them was Francesco Vito, an important young economist at the Catholic University of Milan: “The corporatist economy is a new spiritual orientation for individuals” (1934). Father Gemelli's words were even clearer: "Since 1893, three events have taken place in the social sphere: the promulgation of Rerum Novarum, that of Quadragesimo Anno, and today the agenda of the head of government's speech. Three related events. The first marks the Christian condemnation of liberal disorganization; the second marked the reaffirmation of that condemnation and its extension to the latest socialist formulations; the third sets out principles according to which a modern state, Italy, overcomes liberalism and socialism and completes its corporative organization" (1933). Vitale Viglietti, in his essay Corporativism and Christianity (1935), stated that “such a conception, that of fascist corporatism, is identified with the social idea of Christianity. This is a statement that should be a source of great satisfaction for all Italians.”

Finally—but we could continue with dozens of other similar quotes—Father Angelo Brucculeri, a Jesuit and important writer for Civiltà Cattolica on economic and social ethics issues, wrote: “Today, corporatism in its various forms is a great fact that fills and characterizes our historical moment... But it is not enough to have established the corporation; it is also necessary to develop and multiply corporative consciousness not only among the elite but also among the masses” (1934).

Thanks to this cultural affinity, fascist corporatism met with little resistance in Catholic and pontifical universities. Almost all of the professors who adhered to the corporative economy later had the opportunity and time to dissociate themselves from fascism, and some of them became protagonists of democracy, the Constitution, and reconstruction. But that first season of the Church's social doctrine, too preoccupied with fighting socialism and moderating capitalism, ended up resembling corporate economics too closely. The first landing place of the humanism advocated by Rerum Novarum was a mistaken third way. In order to avoid Scylla and Charybdis, Peter's boat collided with an even more monstrous rock.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-01-31 20:44:31 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-02-03 11:52:30 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-01-31 23:30:23 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/02\/03\/Anima_economica_04_ant1.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/01\/31\/Anima_economica_04_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 160 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 8933 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-01-31 20:44:31 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 467 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20608:a-church-that-enters-history-between-social-justice-and-subsidiarity [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic Soul/4 - The project to create a credible Christian alternative to socialism and liberalism within its own time and absorbing its tensions

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on February 1, 2026

After the publication of Rerum Novarum, the economic, political, and social practices of Catholics experienced a colorful and lively civil spring. Workers' associations, mutual aid societies, and Catholic trade unions multiplied, and cooperatives and rural credit unions exploded in particular. The effects of the encyclical exceeded expectations, because reality is always greater than the idea of reality, and imposes itself with its indomitable freedom. On the intellectual front, Catholic economists and sociologists gave rise to a new and intense season of studies, newspapers, and cultural institutions. Their forefather in Italy was Giuseppe Toniolo, the most influential economist in the Church after Rerum Novarum and the most important interpreter of Leo XIII's teachings. Toniolo made his best scientific contributions to economic history during the first part of his career (the 1880s). His work as a theoretical economist, on the other hand, was modest and not appreciated by the best economists - Pantaleoni wrote to Pareto in 1909: “In Pisa, economics is being murdered by the good Toniolo” (Letters).

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
A Church that enters history. Between social justice and subsidiarity

A Church that enters history. Between social justice and subsidiarity

Economic Soul/4 - The project to create a credible Christian alternative to socialism and liberalism within its own time and absorbing its tensions by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on February 1, 2026 After the publication of Rerum Novarum, the economic, political, and social practices of C...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20598
    [title] => Humanism for “new things” must overcome nostalgia and fear
    [alias] => humanism-for-new-things-must-overcome-nostalgia-and-fear
    [introtext] => 

Economic Soul/3 - The lesson of the magisterial document establishing the principle of subsidiarity: accept the challenges of your time without fearing it

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 25, 2026

Rerum Novarum (RN, 1891), the first encyclical entirely devoted to socio-economic issues, had a symbolic value far greater than its content. Its spirit was much more important than its letter. It stated that economic life and work were an integral part of the thinking and action of the Catholic Church: they were not on the periphery of evangelical humanism, they were at its center. Thousands upon thousands of Catholics finally felt seen, understood, and recognized by the Church in their civil and economic commitment. They already knew this, but after RN they knew it even more, and there were no more doubts. The historical judgment on the content of Rerum Novarum is, however, a different matter, requiring study and a certain amount of courage. 

[fulltext] =>

With the restoration of the ancient regime in Europe desired by the Congress of Vienna after the Napoleonic era (1814), the papacy had also hoped for a return to the world before the French Revolution, deluding itself that the Enlightenment, liberalism, and modern thought could be erased, thus returning to medieval Christianitas, feudalism, and the important political role that popes and bishops had played in past centuries. But the Church was mistaken. The European world had changed forever, and with it, the era of the Church's temporal power had come to an end, as had the era of the submission of states to religious authority. It was a long and painful process that the Catholic Church, the papacy in particular, experienced as a ‘cultural battle’ with modern Europe. At that stage, neither the liberal Catholicism of Alessandro Manzoni, nor the theology of Rosmini, nor the Christianity open to new ideas of the great bishop of Cremona, Geremia Bonomelli, prevailed in the Roman Church.

RN is a document that presents some lights, along with some shadows. The lights are real, important, and highly emphasized in Catholic social tradition. As the full title of the document itself says - De opificium conditione (on the condition of workers) - the condition of workers is a focus of the document. In fact, the most illuminating pages of the encyclical are devoted to work and wages, where the dignity of every worker is reaffirmed, a not too long working day is required (especially for children and women), and it is declared that the game of supply and demand cannot be the only criterion for setting wages: “The worker and the employer should therefore agree on the terms of the contract and the amount of the wage; however, there is always an element of natural justice that precedes and is superior to the free will of the contracting parties” (RN #34). The paragraphs of the Encyclical that establish what will later be called the principle of subsidiarity are also very important: “It is not right that the citizen and the family should be absorbed by the State: it is right, on the contrary, that both should be allowed as much independence as possible, without prejudice to the common good and the rights of others” (RN #28). Subsidiarity is expressed as the right of association, particularly of workers' associations (#37-39). Even the Church of Leo XIII could not renounce community and communities; it wanted to save the community dimension of the Church and with it the ecclesiastical, economic, and civil hierarchy.

The most obscure aspects of RN concern the theme of equality among men, and therefore his vision of wealth and poverty. To understand them, let us return to Matteo Liberatore's Principles of Political Economy (1889), published on the eve of Rerum Novarum. It deals with the great theme of private property and inequality, ideas that we find very similar in RN: “Two things, says St. Thomas, must be distinguished in property: possession and use. As for possession, it can be private, indeed it must be, for the sake of human life. But as for use, it must be common, inasmuch as the possessor shares with the needy what he has in excess” (Principles..., p. 342).

Leo XIII, already in his second encyclical, had affirmed very similar theses: “Socialists, Communists, and Nihilists ... never cease to babble that all men are by nature equal among themselves ... The Church, much more wisely and usefully, even in the possession of goods, recognizes inequality among men” (Quod Apostolici Muneris, 1878). From the defense of property, it is a short step to the defense of inequality (a thesis that we find in Liberatore's Principles of Political Economy (pp. 161-163): “Let us therefore establish first of all this principle, that we must bear the condition proper to humanity: it is impossible to remove social inequalities from the world.” He then continues: “Since the greatest variety exists by nature among men: not all possess the same ingenuity, the same diligence, the same health, or the same strength: and from these inevitable differences arise, of necessity, differences in social conditions” (RN #14).

The Thomism of Leo XIII and the editors he chose also emerges in the emphasis on the sociality of human beings and therefore on the ‘organicist’ view of society, which is the basis of the many paragraphs on associations and corporatism. In the Thomist system, the thesis that society is a body (St. Paul), and therefore all parts are interdependent, brought with it the necessity of hierarchy and the static nature of the places assigned to each (the finger is not the heart, and they cannot exchange functions). And so, RN decisively rejects class struggle and therefore the idea of conflict between bosses and proletarians (RN #15). From this harmonious view of social classes also arises Leo's invitation to revive the medieval Corporations of Arts and Crafts, which we already find in the encyclical Humanum Genus (1884). And then in RN we read: “To settle the labor question ... however, the guilds of arts and crafts hold the first place ... We are pleased to see associations of this kind forming everywhere, whether of workers alone or of workers and employers together” (#36). A thesis that seems bizarre today. As if, in the midst of the development of industrial capitalism and the working masses, it were possible to go back five centuries to an economy of a few commercial cities immersed in the feudal world; as if history and its ‘new things’ had nothing to teach the Church, which is part and daughter of that same history; as if those demands for equality were not also, at least in large part, the fruit of the Church's own gospel.

With his proposal for corporations, Leo XIII went beyond the thinking of the Italian drafters of RN and included some European thinkers, as highlighted in an essay by Alcide De Gasperi (signed with the pseudonym Mario Zanatta: I tempi e gli uomini che prepararono la RN, 1931). Above all, there were some Frenchmen, the Marquis La Tour du Pin-Chambly de la Charce (1834-1924), Count De Mun, and the entrepreneur Léon Harmel, promoters of Catholic corporatism, all of whom were aristocrats. In the revived guilds, class conflict would thus be overcome without upsetting the natural order of property and hierarchy: “There will always be that variety and disparity of condition without which human society cannot exist or even be conceived” (RN #27).

Concluding his discourse on proletarians and masters, Leo XIII writes: "In Christianity, there is a dogma on which the whole edifice of religion rests as its principal foundation: that the true life of man is that of the world to come. ... Whether you have an abundance of riches and other earthly goods or are deprived of them, it matters nothing to eternal happiness“ (RN #18). Therefore, ”it is understood that the true dignity and greatness of man is entirely moral, that is, rooted in virtue; equally attainable by the great and the small, the rich and the proletarians... Let us say more: it seems that God has a particular predilection for the unhappy, since Jesus Christ calls the poor blessed... Thus, the two classes, shaking hands, come to a friendly agreement" (#20).

Reading these theses, we must pause, because we would find ourselves far from the spirit of the Gospel. Jesus healed the sick, raised the paralyzed from their beds, created a fraternal community that shared material goods, and did not console them by leaving them in their misery, waiting for paradise. He said ‘woe’ to the rich, gave us the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, and invited us to pass through the eye of the needle. His Kingdom was and is above all for this life, not for ‘the life to come’. What Leone wrote was an expression of the theology of the Counter-Reformation, the Catholic spirit of his time. After him came Vatican II, Don Mazzolari and Don Zeno, Francesca Cabrini and Pope Francis. Catholics have done little in the way of corporate ventures; those were done by the fascists. Instead, they gave life to trade unions, to many rural banks and cooperatives where they changed and questioned the property rights of capitalism, reduced the inequalities possible on this earth, and continue to do so. They went beyond the letter of Rerum Novarum, they listened to its spirit, which they also saw in the demands for equality of their time and of ours.

Today, we are going through similar times. Fear and nostalgia for the glorious days of the past can no longer be allowed to write the new Rerum Novarum.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-01-24 23:53:20 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-02-02 09:26:44 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-01-24 23:53:20 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/01\/24\/Anima_economica_03B_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/01\/24\/Anima_economica_03B_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 189 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 8805 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-01-24 23:53:20 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 467 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20598:humanism-for-new-things-must-overcome-nostalgia-and-fear [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic Soul/3 - The lesson of the magisterial document establishing the principle of subsidiarity: accept the challenges of your time without fearing it

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 25, 2026

Rerum Novarum (RN, 1891), the first encyclical entirely devoted to socio-economic issues, had a symbolic value far greater than its content. Its spirit was much more important than its letter. It stated that economic life and work were an integral part of the thinking and action of the Catholic Church: they were not on the periphery of evangelical humanism, they were at its center. Thousands upon thousands of Catholics finally felt seen, understood, and recognized by the Church in their civil and economic commitment. They already knew this, but after RN they knew it even more, and there were no more doubts. The historical judgment on the content of Rerum Novarum is, however, a different matter, requiring study and a certain amount of courage. 

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
Humanism for “new things” must overcome nostalgia and fear

Humanism for “new things” must overcome nostalgia and fear

Economic Soul/3 - The lesson of the magisterial document establishing the principle of subsidiarity: accept the challenges of your time without fearing it by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on January 25, 2026 Rerum Novarum (RN, 1891), the first encyclical entirely devoted to socio-economic i...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20587
    [title] => The (difficult) Catholic third way between capitalism and socialism
    [alias] => the-difficult-catholic-third-way-between-capitalism-and-socialism
    [introtext] => 

Economic Soul/2 - From neo-Thomism to withstand the impact of the dominant culture to the ideas of Father Liberatore that paved the way for “Rerum novarum”

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 18, 2026 

«It is an anti-historical attitude par excellence to consider the problems, opinions, and feelings of the past in the same way as the feelings and convictions of a completely different era».

Arturo Carlo Jemolo, «Stato e Chiesa in Italia», p. 23-24

he history of the relationship between the Catholic Church and modern culture is one of missed encounters, mutual accusations and anathemas, which at times became a veritable pitched battle. It is a history that began at least with Luther and the Counter-Reformation and continued, at varying speeds, until Vatican II - and still continues today. The Catholic Church's reaction to the modern spirit was fear, and from this came counterattacks, closures, and condemnations of this disturbing guest. Modern man was therefore not perceived by the Catholic Church as a son, certainly rebellious but still a son; instead, he was perceived as an enemy, as the greatest enemy, the Gog and Magog who could have destroyed Christianitas. We will never know what Modernity and the Church could have become if the enemy had been treated as an adolescent son, if its threats had also been read as a development of the evangelical seeds of the Middle Ages, albeit matured in ways and on soils different from those imagined by the hierarchies and theologians. In the lives of individuals and peoples, the most difficult art to learn is to recognize salvation that comes where and how we would never have thought or wanted it to.

[fulltext] =>

Even the process that led to Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum should be read within this failed encounter: "Leo XIII condemned modern thought, so bold in its judgment of religion and Catholicism, but he did not confront it: he judged it from the outside and from above, like his predecessor, he did not enter into it to analyze it, discern it, or break it down. The two stood facing each other all that time like two powerful armies, without coming into contact.“ These are the words of Romolo Murri, who continued: ”The pontificate of Leo XIII would have had a completely different character from what it had if the doctrinal documents were not what they are: rigid claims and systematic exposition, not a work of penetration into the modern world, of assimilation, of reintegration... Modern society has shown that it neither knows nor wants to persuade itself to abandon its ideas and ways in order to enter into those officially presented to it by the Church,“ because modern society ”wants to have its own experience" (Un papa, un secolo, e il cattolicesimo sociale, 1904, pp. 78-79). A modern experience that the Catholic Church did not understand and condemned, starting with freedom of conscience, its first ‘delusion’, as it was already defined by Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos, 1832), which led to the belief that ‘the faithful and the unbeliever, the orthodox and the heretic are all the same’. (M. Liberatore, La Chiesa e lo Stato, 1872, p. 48). A delusion, therefore, also called Liberalism. These ‘new things’ were not ‘good things’ for the Church, they were very bad; to these were soon added the great pressures of Socialism and Capitalism, and everything became complicated.

In this climate, Gioacchino Pecci, not yet Leo XIII, wrote in his letter for Lent in 1877: “A word that is so often misused by skeptics ... is the word ‘civilization’. This word has become a scourge” (Letters of Cardinal G. Pecci, 1880, pp. 119-120). And on the eve of Rerum Novarum, we read in La Civiltà Cattolica (an anonymous text, but probably by M. Liberatore): “There is no sensible man who does not foresee that, at this rate, Europe will overflow with the horrors of nihilism” (Year 1889, p. 257). Romolo Murri, on the other hand, hoped that the dawn of the 20th century would mark the beginning of something new, that ‘things’ would finally become ‘new’ and good. In other words, he hoped that Catholics would begin to “throw their ideas and their spirit into the forge of this experience of modern society, so that it might mature into a return to sanity, enlightened intentions, and a more intense religious life for humanity” (pp. 80-81). The path taken by Pius X, Leo XIII's successor, was not the one hoped for by Don Romolo Murri, as his personal biographical trajectory also testifies: two years after the publication of his book, Murri was suspended a divinis and then excommunicated in 1909. Pius X, beatified by Pius XII, exacerbated the anti-modernism already present in nineteenth-century Catholicism.

The genesis of Rerum Novarum is part of a very complex theological-social movement. After the Napoleonic period, the Catholic Church had begun, not without resistance, a partial theological and cultural renewal, centered on a return to St. Thomas and his theology. Rerum Novarum was not only the result of a return to the Thomist system and scholasticism, but we cannot understand it without Thomas and Thomism. Leo XIII began his pontificate by explicitly and ‘politically’ declaring his intention to return to Thomas. Aeterni Patris, of 1879, one of his first encyclicals (he wrote eighty-six), was in fact his theological and pastoral manifesto to “revive and restore to its original splendor the doctrine of St. Thomas Aquinas” (AP). Vincenzo Gioacchino Pecci (Vincenzo was the name his mother called him) encountered and embraced Thomism as early as 1828, thanks to the lessons of Luigi Taparelli d'Azeglio. In 1849, the Academy of Thomistic Philosophy was founded in Naples, and a few years later (1879), the magazine Divus Thomas was launched in Piacenza. Giuseppe Pecci, Gioacchino's brother, was also part of the Italian Thomist circle and founded the Academy of St. Thomas in Perugia (1859).

This theological elite realized that traditional, counter-reformist Catholic theology could not withstand the impact of modern thought. To try to face that cultural battle with some hope of not being annihilated, there was only one possibility: to stake everything on the best, most influential, and universally esteemed theologian: Thomas, the Doctor Angelicus, and therefore Aristotle. They were convinced that there was no better resource at their disposal. Thomas was already present in previous theological training (think of Spanish Scholasticism), but he was mixed with popular piety, the cult of saints, Augustine reinterpreted in a Platonic key, manuals for confessors, and the study of theology that was blocked by the reform of the Council of Trent. A relaunch was therefore needed, a systemic overview: “So that sacred theology may take on and assume the nature, form, and character of true science” (Leo XIII, Aeterni Patris). Neo-Thomism was thus born as a reform and innovation of the Church, as a reform of the training of priests. Thomism, however, did not interrupt that long modern season, which the Catholic Church experienced as an unbroken chain of errors from Luther onwards. Thomas did not become a means of dialogue between the Church and modernity, but an instrument of struggle.

When Cardinal Pecci became Leo XIII, he was already a Thomist. The presence of Thomas' philosophy in Rerum Novarum is therefore not attributable to the ideas of the professors who wrote the preparatory drafts. Leo chose them precisely because they were Thomists, as well as being the best in the Catholic world. One of these, certainly the most important and influential, was Father Matteo Liberatore. A native of Salerno like Antonio Genovesi (whom he ignored, although he certainly knew him), he was a Jesuit and one of the founders of Civiltà Cattolica (1850). He was a contemporary of Francesco Ferrara and Giacchino Pecci (a class of iron: all three died over the age of 80, Ferrara at 90 and Leo at 93). A brilliant writer and polemicist, he was one of the most brilliant thinkers of 19th-century Catholicism: “He was at the center of the most important moments in ecclesiastical life” (F. Francesco Dante, La civiltà cattolica e la Rerum Novarum, p. 49).

Towards the end of his life, in 1889, he wrote Principii di Economia Politica (Principles of Political Economy), a volume previewed in several articles published in La Civiltà Cattolica. Translated into English (1891) and French (1899), it had no impact on the economic science of the time. It was ignored by liberal economists. 1889 was also the year of the publication of Maffeo Pantaleoni's Principles of Pure Economics, the most influential textbook of that generation, written when the author was 32 years old: Liberatore was almost 80, another indicator of modernity. Liberatore was not an economist; his book is essentially a long economic homily, which left economic science exactly as he had found it, without even touching it. A treatise that perfectly symbolizes the different and divergent paths that Catholic social doctrine and modern economics had already taken. Reading the book, one realizes that it is a dialogue between the author and a few books—almost all of them at least fifty years old—in his study: Smith, Say, Minghetti, Bastiat, Malthus, Ricardo, Sismondi... There is no reference to Marx, who is hard to imagine in his library. The book is an excellent guide to understanding the approach of Rerum Novarum, where we find many of the ideas in this text by Liberatore. It is more useful to us today than it was to his contemporaries.

The tone of the book perfectly reflects that of the Church of his time: entirely defensive, and therefore polemical, aggressive, and nostalgic. The opening words are already strong and clear: “Modern liberalism is like a fly, which, wherever it alights, leaves a germ of corruption and stench” (p. 5). Liberalism does not coincide with economic liberalism - which Liberatore already calls capitalism - but, as B. Croce will explain later, the two are deeply related. The Catholic Church will hate cultural liberalism but will almost love economic liberalism.

The most interesting pages of the Treatise are those concerning private property, from which emerges the intention of the Church of the time to try to imagine the famous third way between socialism and capitalism. In reality, rather than a third way, it was an attempt to correct the first way, Capitalism, which in its basic social and philosophical structure was far preferred to Socialism, with a few adjustments (in employer-employee relations, in charity, and little else). The real enemy was therefore socialism, and capitalism appeared to be the lesser evil and perhaps even a good, especially because of its tenacious defense of private property and inequality among men as a natural and necessary condition—we will see this next Sunday. For now, let us just savor this sentence of his: "The most curious thing is that the advocates of equality boast of freedom. And they do not understand that freedom and equality are at odds with each other" (p. 163).

The third way inaugurated by Rerum Novarum thus became only the Catholic way to capitalism. Modernity, which was very frightening on a religious and social level (Liberalism and Socialism), was much less frightening in its capitalist guise. And today we see all the consequences.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-01-18 08:30:40 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-01-19 08:54:30 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-01-18 08:30:40 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/01\/19\/Anima_economica_02A_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/01\/16\/Anima_economica_02A_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 294 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9928 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-01-18 08:30:40 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 467 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20587:the-difficult-catholic-third-way-between-capitalism-and-socialism [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic Soul/2 - From neo-Thomism to withstand the impact of the dominant culture to the ideas of Father Liberatore that paved the way for “Rerum novarum”

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 18, 2026 

«It is an anti-historical attitude par excellence to consider the problems, opinions, and feelings of the past in the same way as the feelings and convictions of a completely different era».

Arturo Carlo Jemolo, «Stato e Chiesa in Italia», p. 23-24

he history of the relationship between the Catholic Church and modern culture is one of missed encounters, mutual accusations and anathemas, which at times became a veritable pitched battle. It is a history that began at least with Luther and the Counter-Reformation and continued, at varying speeds, until Vatican II - and still continues today. The Catholic Church's reaction to the modern spirit was fear, and from this came counterattacks, closures, and condemnations of this disturbing guest. Modern man was therefore not perceived by the Catholic Church as a son, certainly rebellious but still a son; instead, he was perceived as an enemy, as the greatest enemy, the Gog and Magog who could have destroyed Christianitas. We will never know what Modernity and the Church could have become if the enemy had been treated as an adolescent son, if its threats had also been read as a development of the evangelical seeds of the Middle Ages, albeit matured in ways and on soils different from those imagined by the hierarchies and theologians. In the lives of individuals and peoples, the most difficult art to learn is to recognize salvation that comes where and how we would never have thought or wanted it to.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-odd )
The (difficult) Catholic third way between capitalism and socialism

The (difficult) Catholic third way between capitalism and socialism

Economic Soul/2 - From neo-Thomism to withstand the impact of the dominant culture to the ideas of Father Liberatore that paved the way for “Rerum novarum” by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on January 18, 2026  «It is an anti-historical attitude par excellence to consider the problems, opini...
stdClass Object
(
    [id] => 20567
    [title] => Economics and Italian Catholicism, a century and a half of “new things”
    [alias] => economics-and-italian-catholicism-a-century-and-a-half-of-new-things
    [introtext] => 

Economic soul/1 - From the thinking of Antonio Genovesi in the 18th century, heir to the medieval tradition, to the long eclipse of the 19th century. Until the 20th century

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 11, 2026

An important path to follow is that of a different reading of the history of economic thought, and in particular of the Italian tradition, as is already beginning to be done, reevaluating Genovesi and other civil economists. If we were able to identify an Italian tradition, different from the one that has become official [mainstream], which has its own genealogy, this would be an operation of primary importance.”

Giacomo Becattini, “Human well-being and ‘project’ enterprises,” 2002 

There have been periods in European civilization when the love, pain, experiences, and experiments of Christians have generated words of flesh that have then become papal encyclicals, documents, magazines, and books that have universalized and generalized that civil love and pain. We would not have had Rerum Novarum (1891) – or it would have been much poorer and less influential – without the cooperative movement, rural banks, the trade union movement, workers' leagues, mutual aid societies, the Opera dei Congressi (Congress Work)... Of course, the theological ideas of Father Matteo Liberatore and the socio-economic ideas of the young professor Giuseppe Toniolo were also important, but it was first the facts that sifted, discerned, selected, and valued the ideas of theologians, philosophers, economists, and then popes. In Christianity, it is not ideas that validate facts, but the opposite. ‘Reality is superior to the idea’ is not only a principle very dear to Pope Francis, but above all a synthesis of Christianity, of its humanism based on the Word made flesh - the Logos did not enter history by becoming an idea, an ideology or a book, but by becoming a child. Ideas are alive, life-giving and capable of transforming the world only when they are flesh.

[fulltext] =>

Therefore, the impact, quality, and transformative capacity of a Church document depend greatly, almost entirely, on the quality and generative capacity of entrepreneurs, cooperators, politicians, citizens, scholars, and above all, entire Christian communities, who live and experience new things in their individual and collective flesh. The ‘sympathetic’ ink of important Church documents is the blood of witnesses and martyrs. We are all awaiting Pope Leo's first social encyclical, and we are well aware that this document cannot create reality: it can see it, give it wings, amplify it, it can turn some small ‘already’ into ‘not yet’; but once again it will be the reality that the Church and humanity are already experiencing that will give quality and impact to Leo XIV's encyclicals, as was the case with Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum. Without this ‘flesh’ and this life, encyclicals are paper documents that do not improve the economic and social world.

The series of articles we are beginning today is an exploration of the intertwining of economics and Catholicism in contemporary Italy, particularly during that long century that took us from the mid-19th century to the end of the 20th century, passing through socialism, modernism, wars, and fascism with its ‘corporatist’ economic doctrine, which we will also deal with. Economics and the Catholic religion will therefore be the two axes of this reflection. In some articles, economics will prevail, in others religion, but in all there will be dialogue between the two.

To speak of Italian economic tradition means above all to speak of civil economy, which is the name that economic science took from its origins with Antonio Genovesi in the mid-18th century, when an economic-civil tradition that began in the Middle Ages with monasticism, merchants, the Franciscans and their doctrines on usury, their Monti di Pietà and Monti frumentari came to maturity. With the birth of the unified state, that ancient tradition of Italian (but also European) thought underwent a fracture and then a long eclipse. And that is where we start.

Until the early 19th century, the Italian tradition of civil economy was still alive and respected. Between 1802 and 1816, Pietro Custodi of Milan published the ‘Collezione degli Economisti Classici Italiani’ (Collection of Italian Classical Economists) in fifty volumes, a fundamental work for the dissemination of Italian economic thought in the new universities and among the new politicians. But when, in 1850, on the initiative of Francesco Ferrara, who was the most influential economist of his generation, the Biblioteca dell'Economista (Economist's Library) was created, only one of the 13 volumes (the third) was dedicated to Italian economists. The cultural climate was, in fact, changing rapidly and radically. In his introduction to that third volume, Ferrara has kind words for Genovesi, whom he, not surprisingly, places as the first author of the volume: ‘The oldest chair of economics in Italy, and one of the oldest in Europe, is that of Naples, established in 1754 by Genovesi’. He then provides some biographical notes on Genovesi: "Unpopular with the monks and priests of the schools, whose ignorance served as a dark backdrop to the splendid fame of this innovative priest, who, avoiding Latin as much as possible, relying on arguments that rebelled against the strict forms of syllogism, quoting English and French authors, pronouncing with equally impassive lips the truth of the Bible and the passage of the heretical writer, was nevertheless enthusiastically frequented by an eager youth... This was Genovesi" (Vol. 3, pp. V-VI). Genovesi, also on the explicit recommendation of Intieri, the financier of the chair, taught in Italian (not Latin), an innovative fact that did not escape Ferrara: “According to the custom of the time, Genovesi began the next day to dictate his lessons to the young people; and he himself recounts that it seemed a marvel to hear a professor speaking Italian from his chair for the first time,” and denounced “the fault of the Italians in holding their language in very low esteem” (pp. VII-VIII), a fault that continues and grows today. So much for the fine words about Genovesi and his Economia civile.

Despite his personal esteem for Genovesi, however, Ferrara believed that the true science of economics was now only that of the English and the French. Genovesi and the Italians were merely prehistory, the ancien régime: “The merits of the first foundation of economics belong to the Englishman Smith or the Frenchman Turgot, not to Genovesi” (p. XXXVI). The Italian tradition, in his opinion, had not been able to enter modernity because it was still imprisoned by moral and political concerns. Economics as a science independent of both morality and the ‘prince’ had instead been founded by Adam Smith in his Wealth of Nations (1776): “The ancient Italian school offers nothing that might recommend it to our preference... I will share the sentiment of national self-love, but I will continue to study Smith in order to learn economics” (p. XXXV). And so he concludes coherently: “If the Biblioteca dell'economista had been assigned a less ambitious purpose than it had, perhaps none of the Italian authors now included in this volume would have been included” (p. LXX). This was a very strong and clear thesis, which proved decisive.

Genovesi's non-modernity lay, therefore, in his choice to frame issues in a ‘broad and complex’ manner. His mistake was one of method: he failed to look at wealth from an ‘abstract and absolute point of view, but rather from that of general welfare’ or public happiness. For Ferrara, on the other hand, Smith was the true founder of modern economic science, precisely because he abandoned this ‘broad and complex approach’ to focus solely on economic variables - it is the birth of homo oeconomicus (more in Ferrara than in Smith): ‘Smith's merit lies in having felt the need to abandon ... broad and complex formulas before others did’. And this was ‘an immense step forward’, it was ‘the Cogito of economics’ (p. XL).

For Ferrara, the reference to 18th-century Italian economists was therefore an attempt to ‘cover up the nullity of the present with memories of the past’ (p. LXX). The nullity was obviously that of his present—the mid-19th century was certainly not a time of great theoretical talent for Italian economics—but the temptation to return to a noble past when the present is poor (as ours is) is always present. Therefore, Ferrara's warning is also important for us today, an invitation not to console ourselves by remembering the great fathers in the time of the little grandchildren.

Francesco Ferrara was a staunch liberal economist and a child of the century of Darwin, Marx, and positivism, a colleague, in method, of John S. Mill. For him, ‘true’ economic science could only arise by renouncing the ‘whole’ in order to study the ‘fragment,’ leaving aside ‘public happiness’ to focus on production costs and consumer utility. Ferrara was the bridge that Italian civil economics of the 18th century had to cross to reach the second half of the 19th century. It was a very narrow bridge, almost a needle's eye, which allowed very little of that great classical heritage to pass through, too little for any trace of it to remain.

After this passage, civil economy left academia, but - and here is a key point - it also left the thinking and action of the Catholic world, its economists and sociologists, cooperators, trade unionists, popes, and bishops. In fact, starting with the leader Toniolo, the Catholic tradition that would inspire Rerum Novarum and then Social Doctrine would not reconnect with Genovesi or Civil Economy, which were ignored or considered too modern and distant from the neo-Thomism that would guide many documents. We cannot understand the Social Doctrine of the Church between the 19th and 20th centuries unless we bear in mind that it developed during Pius IX's Non expedit and the modernist controversy of Pius X and his successors until Vatican II. This was a climate of closure to the modern world and its demands for a scientific study of the Bible, not least because these demands came mainly from Protestant countries. Added to this already complex picture was the birth and development of socialism and Marxism, which further complicated dialogue with the past and with the contemporary world, occupying much of the energy of Catholics, probably too much.

The disappearance of Italian civil tradition from the thinking of the Church is one of the reasons for the failure of Catholicism to engage with modernity and for its anti-modernism, which are still a serious problem for the Catholic world and its reflection on the economy and society. Genovesi, who, according to Ferrara, was too little modern because he was fascinated by ‘broad and complex formulas’, became instead too modern and with categories too broad and complex to fit into the Thomism that Leo XIII had placed at the center of the Church's thinking. Along with civil economy, Franciscans, monasticism, Tuscan merchants, pawnshops and grain banks, Bernardino da Feltre and Muratori, together with a serious biblical perspective, were also left out of Catholic social doctrine. All this was shrouded in a dark night that lasted almost two centuries, which we will discuss in these articles. During this long night, some angels slipped in along with many ghosts, which still populate the dreams of the Catholic world. Perhaps it is time to wake up.

 

[checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [catid] => 1173 [created] => 2026-01-11 01:01:51 [created_by] => 64 [created_by_alias] => Luigino Bruni [state] => 1 [modified] => 2026-01-13 08:51:51 [modified_by] => 64 [modified_by_name] => Antonella Ferrucci [publish_up] => 2026-01-11 01:01:51 [publish_down] => 0000-00-00 00:00:00 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {"urla":false,"urlatext":"","targeta":"","urlb":false,"urlbtext":"","targetb":"","urlc":false,"urlctext":"","targetc":""} [attribs] => {"article_layout":"","show_title":"","link_titles":"","show_tags":"","show_intro":"","info_block_position":"","info_block_show_title":"","show_category":"","link_category":"","show_parent_category":"","link_parent_category":"","show_associations":"","show_author":"","link_author":"","show_create_date":"","show_modify_date":"","show_publish_date":"","show_item_navigation":"","show_icons":"","show_print_icon":"","show_email_icon":"","show_vote":"","show_hits":"","show_noauth":"","urls_position":"","alternative_readmore":"","article_page_title":"","show_publishing_options":"","show_article_options":"","show_urls_images_backend":"","show_urls_images_frontend":"","helix_ultimate_image":"images\/2026\/01\/12\/Anima_economica_02_ant1.jpg","helix_ultimate_image_alt_txt":"","spfeatured_image":"images\/2026\/01\/10\/Anima_economica_01_ant.jpg","helix_ultimate_article_format":"standard","helix_ultimate_audio":"","helix_ultimate_gallery":"","helix_ultimate_video":"","video":""} [metadata] => {"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":""} [metakey] => [metadesc] => [access] => 1 [hits] => 257 [xreference] => [featured] => 1 [language] => en-GB [on_img_default] => 0 [readmore] => 9867 [ordering] => 0 [category_title] => En - Economic soul [category_route] => economia-civile/it-anima-economica [category_access] => 1 [category_alias] => en-economic-soul [published] => 1 [parents_published] => 1 [lft] => 96 [author] => Luigino Bruni [author_email] => ferrucci.anto@gmail.com [parent_title] => Economia Civile [parent_id] => 1024 [parent_route] => economia-civile [parent_alias] => economia-civile [rating] => 0 [rating_count] => 0 [alternative_readmore] => [layout] => [params] => Joomla\Registry\Registry Object ( [data:protected] => stdClass Object ( [article_layout] => _:default [show_title] => 1 [link_titles] => 1 [show_intro] => 1 [info_block_position] => 0 [info_block_show_title] => 1 [show_category] => 1 [link_category] => 1 [show_parent_category] => 1 [link_parent_category] => 1 [show_associations] => 0 [flags] => 1 [show_author] => 0 [link_author] => 0 [show_create_date] => 1 [show_modify_date] => 0 [show_publish_date] => 1 [show_item_navigation] => 1 [show_vote] => 0 [show_readmore] => 0 [show_readmore_title] => 0 [readmore_limit] => 100 [show_tags] => 1 [show_icons] => 1 [show_print_icon] => 1 [show_email_icon] => 1 [show_hits] => 0 [record_hits] => 1 [show_noauth] => 0 [urls_position] => 1 [captcha] => [show_publishing_options] => 1 [show_article_options] => 1 [save_history] => 1 [history_limit] => 10 [show_urls_images_frontend] => 0 [show_urls_images_backend] => 1 [targeta] => 0 [targetb] => 0 [targetc] => 0 [float_intro] => left [float_fulltext] => left [category_layout] => _:blog [show_category_heading_title_text] => 0 [show_category_title] => 0 [show_description] => 0 [show_description_image] => 0 [maxLevel] => 0 [show_empty_categories] => 0 [show_no_articles] => 0 [show_subcat_desc] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles] => 0 [show_cat_tags] => 1 [show_base_description] => 1 [maxLevelcat] => -1 [show_empty_categories_cat] => 0 [show_subcat_desc_cat] => 0 [show_cat_num_articles_cat] => 0 [num_leading_articles] => 0 [num_intro_articles] => 14 [num_columns] => 2 [num_links] => 0 [multi_column_order] => 1 [show_subcategory_content] => -1 [show_pagination_limit] => 1 [filter_field] => hide [show_headings] => 1 [list_show_date] => 0 [date_format] => [list_show_hits] => 1 [list_show_author] => 1 [list_show_votes] => 0 [list_show_ratings] => 0 [orderby_pri] => none [orderby_sec] => rdate [order_date] => published [show_pagination] => 2 [show_pagination_results] => 1 [show_featured] => show [show_feed_link] => 1 [feed_summary] => 0 [feed_show_readmore] => 0 [sef_advanced] => 1 [sef_ids] => 1 [custom_fields_enable] => 1 [show_page_heading] => 0 [layout_type] => blog [menu_text] => 1 [menu_show] => 1 [secure] => 0 [helixultimatemenulayout] => {"width":600,"menualign":"right","megamenu":0,"showtitle":1,"faicon":"","customclass":"","dropdown":"right","badge":"","badge_position":"","badge_bg_color":"","badge_text_color":"","layout":[]} [helixultimate_enable_page_title] => 1 [helixultimate_page_title_alt] => Economic soul [helixultimate_page_subtitle] => Civil Economy [helixultimate_page_title_heading] => h2 [page_title] => Economic soul [page_description] => [page_rights] => [robots] => [access-view] => 1 ) [initialized:protected] => 1 [separator] => . ) [displayDate] => 2026-01-11 01:01:51 [tags] => Joomla\CMS\Helper\TagsHelper Object ( [tagsChanged:protected] => [replaceTags:protected] => [typeAlias] => [itemTags] => Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [tag_id] => 239 [id] => 239 [parent_id] => 1 [lft] => 475 [rgt] => 476 [level] => 1 [path] => anima-economica [title] => Anima economica [alias] => anima-economica [note] => [description] => [published] => 1 [checked_out] => 0 [checked_out_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [access] => 1 [params] => {"tag_layout":"","tag_link_class":"label label-info"} [metadesc] => [metakey] => [metadata] => {"author":"","robots":""} [created_user_id] => 64 [created_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [created_by_alias] => [modified_user_id] => 0 [modified_time] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [images] => {"image_intro":"","float_intro":"","image_intro_alt":"","image_intro_caption":"","image_fulltext":"","float_fulltext":"","image_fulltext_alt":"","image_fulltext_caption":""} [urls] => {} [hits] => 467 [language] => * [version] => 1 [publish_up] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 [publish_down] => 2026-01-09 22:47:25 ) ) ) [slug] => 20567:economics-and-italian-catholicism-a-century-and-a-half-of-new-things [parent_slug] => 1024:economia-civile [catslug] => 1173:en-economic-soul [event] => stdClass Object ( [afterDisplayTitle] => [beforeDisplayContent] => [afterDisplayContent] => ) [text] =>

Economic soul/1 - From the thinking of Antonio Genovesi in the 18th century, heir to the medieval tradition, to the long eclipse of the 19th century. Until the 20th century

by Luigino Bruni

published in Avvenire on January 11, 2026

An important path to follow is that of a different reading of the history of economic thought, and in particular of the Italian tradition, as is already beginning to be done, reevaluating Genovesi and other civil economists. If we were able to identify an Italian tradition, different from the one that has become official [mainstream], which has its own genealogy, this would be an operation of primary importance.”

Giacomo Becattini, “Human well-being and ‘project’ enterprises,” 2002 

There have been periods in European civilization when the love, pain, experiences, and experiments of Christians have generated words of flesh that have then become papal encyclicals, documents, magazines, and books that have universalized and generalized that civil love and pain. We would not have had Rerum Novarum (1891) – or it would have been much poorer and less influential – without the cooperative movement, rural banks, the trade union movement, workers' leagues, mutual aid societies, the Opera dei Congressi (Congress Work)... Of course, the theological ideas of Father Matteo Liberatore and the socio-economic ideas of the young professor Giuseppe Toniolo were also important, but it was first the facts that sifted, discerned, selected, and valued the ideas of theologians, philosophers, economists, and then popes. In Christianity, it is not ideas that validate facts, but the opposite. ‘Reality is superior to the idea’ is not only a principle very dear to Pope Francis, but above all a synthesis of Christianity, of its humanism based on the Word made flesh - the Logos did not enter history by becoming an idea, an ideology or a book, but by becoming a child. Ideas are alive, life-giving and capable of transforming the world only when they are flesh.

[jcfields] => Array ( ) [type] => intro [oddeven] => item-even )
Economics and Italian Catholicism, a century and a half of “new things”

Economics and Italian Catholicism, a century and a half of “new things”

Economic soul/1 - From the thinking of Antonio Genovesi in the 18th century, heir to the medieval tradition, to the long eclipse of the 19th century. Until the 20th century by Luigino Bruni published in Avvenire on January 11, 2026 “An important path to follow is that of a different reading of th...